Skip to main content
Version: 2.2 (current)
MCF 2.2 – Canonical·Last updated: 2026-02-13

Failure Modes

Scope​

This section specifies canonical failure mode categories and boundary statements for MCF 2.2 (Steup, 2005).

Failure Mode Taxonomy​

The canonical specification recognizes failure modes across epistemic, execution, and governance domains.

Epistemic Failure Modes​

Epistemic failures are failures of evidence integrity as defined in Definitions, inference, or epistemic claims (Steup, 2005; Kelly, 2006). These include failures associated with evidence decay or expiration and violations of the anti-theater principle; see Evidence Logic.

Execution Failure Modes​

Execution failures are failures in implementation behavior that do not, by themselves, change epistemic state validity. Execution activity does not substitute for evidence.

Governance Failure Modes​

Governance failures are failures of decision rights, accountability, traceability, or boundary compliance (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015; ISO/TC 176, 2016); see Governance Boundaries and Decision Theory.

Anti-Theater Implications​

Theater amplifies failure modes across epistemic, execution, and governance domains and has no epistemic weight (Kelly, 2006).

Non-Operational Boundary​

This section does not provide mitigations, controls, checklists, or operational remedies.