Decision Theory
Scope
This section specifies decision thresholds, reversibility, and termination-adjacent constraints within the canonical decision logic (Steele, 2015).
Decision Thresholds
A decision threshold is a canonical boundary defined by evidence sufficiency and quality; see Definitions (Steele, 2015). Decisions require evidence that meets the applicable sufficiency thresholds as defined in Evidence Logic.
Reversibility and Irreversibility
Decisions may be reversible or effectively irreversible depending on context (Gilboa, 2010). Reversibility is a canonical property of a decision state, not a process step. Irreversibility increases the evidentiary burden required to justify a decision (Gilboa, 2010).
Decision Integrity Constraints
Decision integrity excludes decision theater; see the anti-theater principle. Decisions must be justified by traceable evidence and remain auditable within the governance boundaries defined elsewhere.
Deferred Decisions and Optionality Preservation
Strategic deferral is a valid decision outcome when thresholds are not met (Gilboa, 2010). Optionality preservation is a canonical constraint that limits irreversible commitments until evidence supports the decision.
Termination-Adjacent Logic
Termination is a governed outcome with explicit logic defined elsewhere; see Versioning and Termination. Termination decisions are subject to the highest integrity constraints.
Relationship to Stages
Decisions interact with epistemic stage states without defining stages as workflow steps; see the Epistemic Model.
Non-Operational Boundary
This section does not prescribe decision-making processes, meeting structures, or governance rituals.